Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01383252
Unsedated Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance
Comparison of Study Method Versus Conventional Method for Performing Unsedated Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 10 (actual)
- Sponsor
- VA Northern California Health Care System · Federal
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 50 Years – 75 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
In a prospective, randomized, controlled study, two methods (water method vs. air method) of performing colonoscopy will be compared in patients undergoing unsedated colonoscopy for CRC screening. The investigators hypothesize that: 1. Study method increases overall cecal intubation with comparable assessment of current experience and patient willingness to repeat future colonoscopy compared with conventional colonoscopy 2. Study method improves bowel preparation and increases polyp pickup rate
Detailed description
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening for the high and the low risk healthy asymptomatic Veterans Affairs (VA) patients is being promoted. Compliance with this Directive will result in an increased number of VA patients undergoing colonoscopy. The demand for colonoscopy far exceeds the capacity available to perform the procedure in the VA system. The conventional practice for colonoscopy at VA facilities across the country is to perform colonoscopy under conscious sedation with air insufflation. Efficiency is governed by the fact that sedated patients require time and space for recovery and these are major limiting factors in the current setting for the use of colonoscopy for CRC screening. In a prospective, randomized, controlled trial (RCT), two methods of performing colonoscopy will be compared in patients undergoing unsedated colonoscopy for CRC screening. We compared the water infusion in lieu of air insufflation (water method) with the conventional air insufflation method. We hypothesize that the water method (Study method) increases overall cecal intubation with comparable assessment of current experience and patient willingness to repeat future colonoscopy compared with conventional colonoscopy. In addition, the water method improves bowel preparation and increases polyp pickup rate.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Water infusion in lieu of air insufflation | Air pump is turned off, water is infused using a peristaltic pump to aid colonoscope insertion until the cecum is reached. Air pockets and dirty water are suctioned before clean water is infused (exchange) to facilitate scope insertion. |
| PROCEDURE | Air method | Conventional air method with minimal insufflation of air to aid scope insertion until the cecum is reached. Water in aliquots will be used for irrigation and cleansing. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2010-02-01
- Primary completion
- 2013-06-01
- Completion
- 2013-06-01
- First posted
- 2011-06-28
- Last updated
- 2013-06-17
Locations
1 site across 1 country: United States
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01383252. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.