Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT01355939

Comparative Effectiveness Multicenter Trial for Adhesion Characteristics of Ventral Hernia Repair Mesh

A Prospective Multicenter Trial to Evaluate Adhesion Characteristics and Adhesiolysis-related Complications of Barrier-coated and Non-barrier-coated Intraperitoneal Mesh During Abdominal Re-exploration After Prior Ventral Hernia Repair

Status
Completed
Phase
Study type
Observational
Enrollment
173 (actual)
Sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The proposed study will compare the benefits, harms, and comparative effectiveness of intraperitoneal barrier-coated and non-barrier coated ventral hernia repair (VHR) mesh in reducing adhesions, adhesion-related complications, and adhesiolysis sequelae in actual patient subpopulations and clinical circumstances. A subset of the data will be analyzed to compare the benefits, harms, and comparative effectiveness of the laparoscopic and open approaches to adhesiolysis. A comprehensive array of health-related risk factors and patient-centered outcomes will be assessed in the investigators diverse patient population for proper multivariate data analysis. Specific Aim I: To evaluate and compare the adhesion characteristics of intraperitoneal barrier-coated versus non-barrier-coated mesh during abdominal re-exploration after prior ventral hernia repair. Specific Aim II: To evaluate and compare the adhesion-related complications and adhesiolysis-related complications of intraperitoneal barrier-coated versus non-barrier-coated mesh during abdominal re-exploration after prior ventral hernia repair. Specific Aim III: To determine the comparative effectiveness of intraperitoneal barrier-coated versus non-barrier-coated ventral hernia repair mesh in reducing adhesions, adhesion-related complications, and adhesiolysis sequelae in actual patient subpopulations and clinical circumstances. Specific Aim IV: To evaluate and compare the adhesiolysis-related complications of the laparoscopic and open approaches to adhesiolysis during abdominal re-exploration after prior ventral hernia repair. Specific Aim V: To determine the comparative effectiveness of the laparoscopic and open approaches to adhesiolysis during abdominal re-exploration after prior ventral hernia repair.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREClinically-Indicated Abdominal Re-Exploration SurgeryThis is a prospective observational study. Abdominal re-exploration surgery is clinically-indicated and planned as the standard of care for the patients regardless of their decision to participate in the study.

Timeline

Start date
2011-05-01
Primary completion
2015-01-01
Completion
2015-01-01
First posted
2011-05-19
Last updated
2015-02-23

Locations

6 sites across 1 country: United States

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01355939. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.