Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT01354535

Types of Fixation of Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Fractures

Isolated Locked Compression Plating Versus Cable Plating and Strut Allografts With Cerclage Wiring for Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Unknown
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
89 (estimated)
Sponsor
Unity Health Toronto · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare two different but standard treatments for the fixation of Vancouver B1 periprosthetic. The investigators aim to compare open reduction internal fixation using a locked plating system versus plating and strut allograft with cerclage wiring to determine which treatment results in a faster return to function as measured by the TUG test at 6 weeks post-op.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREIsolated Locked Compression PlateA lateral thigh incision will be used to expose the fracture site. Surgeons will attempt to minimize devascularization of the bone by meticulous dissection and indirect reduction techniques. An appropriate sized plate will be applied to the lateral aspect of the femur. Fracture reduction will be achieved with the use of intra-operative fluoroscopy and the plate will be secured with locking screws.
PROCEDURECable Plating and Strut Allograft with Cerclage WiringThe plate will be placed laterally with the allograft strut placed on the anterior cortex. Screw fixation will be used distal to the stem and cables and screws will be used proximal to the stem tip. Cerclage cables or wires will be used to secure the strut.

Timeline

Start date
2013-02-01
Primary completion
2023-06-01
Completion
2023-06-01
First posted
2011-05-17
Last updated
2021-06-18

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Canada

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01354535. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.