Trials / Withdrawn
WithdrawnNCT01327521
Transarterial Chemoembolization vs CyberKnife for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma
International Randomized Study of Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus CyberKnife for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Status
- Withdrawn
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 0 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Albert Koong · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Primary Objective: To compare the efficacy of TACE vs. CyberKnife SBRT in the treatment of locally recurrent HCC after initial TACE. Secondary Objectives: 1. To determine the progression-free survival of TACE vs. CyberKnife SBRT 2. To determine the overall survival of TACE vs. CyberKnife SBRT for locally recurrent HCC 3. To determine the toxicities associated with TACE or CyberKnife SBRT for the treatment of recurrent HCC.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | CyberKnife | Standard of Care |
| PROCEDURE | TACE | Standard of Care |
| DRUG | CT Contrast | Standard of Care |
| DRUG | doxorubicin | Standard of Care |
| DRUG | Epirubicin | Standard of Care |
| DRUG | 5-fluorouracil | Standard of Care |
| DRUG | Mitomycin C | Standard of Care |
| DRUG | Gemcitabine | Standard of Care |
| DRUG | Cisplatin | Standard of Care |
| DEVICE | SMANCS | Standard of Care |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2011-02-01
- Primary completion
- 2014-02-01
- First posted
- 2011-04-01
- Last updated
- 2012-06-11
Locations
1 site across 1 country: United States
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01327521. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.