Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT01289262

Long Term Comparison of Two Different Techniques of Uterine Cesarean Incision Closure

Long Term Comparison of Double Layer Continuously Locked Closure of Uterine Incision in Cesarean Section Versus Double Layer Purse String Closure (Turan Technique): A Prospective Randomized Study

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
168 (actual)
Sponsor
Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital · Other Government
Sex
Female
Age
18 Years – 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Cesarean section (C/S) is an operation most commonly performed in Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics. Complications related with incomplete healing of Kerr uterine incision after C/S (adhesions, separation (dehiscence), endometritis, endometriosis, anomalous placentation in subsequent pregnancies, incomplete or complete uterine rupture in subsequent pregnancies, ...) are very important issues. Classically Kerr incision is repaired with continuous locked suturing. Purse string suturing of Kerr incision may reduce the size of the incision and in turn may reduce short and long term complications. For this reason, the investigators aimed to compare two closure techniques.

Detailed description

In the clinic, patients undergoing cesarean section that meet the criteria for inclusion into the study and agreed to participate in the study will be randomized into two groups (computer-assisted randomization method will be used.) In the first group of patients classical closure method of Kerr incision(double layered continuously locked suturing) will be used. In the second group of patients double layered purse string closure technique will be used. Women will be followed for a subsequent pregnancy in the next average 6 years. If they become pregnant again they will be followed up during pregnancy for comparison of long-term effects of the two suture techniques. Patients will be followed especially from the aspects of placental anomalies. Presence of intra-abdominal adhesions, uterine dehiscence, placenta previa, placental invasion anomalies (eg, placenta accreta and others)and incomplete or complete rupture will be compared between two groups.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREPurse string closure techniqueUterine incision will be closed with purse string closure technique.
PROCEDUREContinuously locked closure techniqueUterine incision will be closed with continuously locked closure technique

Timeline

Start date
2011-01-01
Primary completion
2017-01-01
Completion
2023-08-01
First posted
2011-02-03
Last updated
2024-08-19
Results posted
2024-08-19

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01289262. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.

Long Term Comparison of Two Different Techniques of Uterine Cesarean Incision Closure (NCT01289262) · Clinical Trials Directory