Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01281098
Prospective, Randomized, Open Label, Phase II Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Macugen® (Pegaptanib 0.3 mg Intravitreal Injections) Plus Panretinal Photocoagulation and PRP (Monotherapy) in the Treatment With High Risk PDR.
Prospective, Randomized, Open Label, Phase II Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Macugen® (Pegaptanib 0.3 mg Intravitreal Injections) Plus Panretinal Photocoagulation (PRP) and PRP (Monotherapy) in the Treatment of Patients With High Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR).
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 22 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
To evaluate the safety and determine the efficacy of PRP monotherapy or combination therapy (pegaptanib 0.3 mg plus PRP) in patients with Type I or Type II diabetes mellitus and with high risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
Detailed description
Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) can cause regression of retinal neovascularization and reduce the risk of severe vision loss in people with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). However, this destructive treatment may be associated with side effects (e.g. pain, transient blurring, loss of peripheral and/or night vision, increased risk of macular edema and central vision loss) and it is not always efficient in the regression of the neovascularization. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been shown to play a role in retinal neovascularization and retinal vascular leakage related with PDR and diabetic macular edema. Anti-VEGF treatments have been hypothesized as an adjunctive treatment for the management of retinal neovascularization and macular edema related with diabetic retinopathy (DR). Anti-VEGF agents, such as Macugen®, combined with PRP are expected to control neovascularization without the need for photocoagulation of the posterior pole, around the macula, thus avoiding the major side effects of standard PRP (visual field loss). A modification of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) was recently proposed by Madeira et al., (2009) at the 2009 EURETINA Meeting. The described technique involves the progressive application of the DRS photocoagulation rings in a different sequence. First ring: corresponds to the DRS third ring, extruding from the ora serrata to the midperiphery. Second ring: corresponds to DRS second ring, extruding from the midperiphery towards the vortex veins. Third ring: corresponds to DRS first ring, and will only be performed if necessary. This technique resulted in less aggressive visual fields losses by achieving results with only most peripheral photocoagulation. The combination of intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment with pegaptanib, where a series of 3 injections are injected to reverse the neovascularization, while maintaining the macula dry will be completed by the more long term effect of the panretinal photocoagulation. This peripheral photocoagulation proposed is expected to eliminate the chronic VEGF stimulus by eliminating the chronic ischemic factor, while maintaining the visual fields useful for daily activities such as driving, etc.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Panretinal Photocoagulation (PRP) | Panretinal Photocoagulation (PRP) |
| DRUG | Intravitreous injection of pegaptanib | Intravitreous injection of pegaptanib |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2010-03-01
- Primary completion
- 2012-10-01
- Completion
- 2013-02-01
- First posted
- 2011-01-21
- Last updated
- 2015-03-19
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Portugal
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01281098. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.