NCT01263431

Comparison Between Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy and Haemorrhoidal Dearterialisation With Anopexy

Prospective Randomized Trial on Surgical Treatment of Grade 3 Hemorrhoids: Hemorrhoidectomy Versus Doppler-guided Transanal Haemorrhoidal Dearterialisation and Anopexy

• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 4
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 50 (actual)
• Sponsor: Scientific Institute San Raffaele · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 80 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

Aim of the study is to compare short term results of 2 surgical treatment for grade 3 hemorrhoidal disease, namely: pain and postoperative morbidity,complications and effectiveness within 30 days, re-starting daily and working activity, patients' satisfaction

Detailed description

Excisional haemorrhoidectomy is burdened by severe postoperative pain. For this reason less painful treatments have been developed, such as Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation and stapled anopexy. Both techniques seem to be safe, causing little postoperative pain. A combination of the two techniques could possibly treat both bleeding and prolapse with minimal discomfort

Conditions

• Third Degree Hemorrhoids

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Hemorrhoidectomy	Each of the main haemorrhoid is dissected and the apex is ligated and then cut, near to the dentate line
PROCEDURE	Hemorrhoidal dearterialization	A special instrument (THD, G.F., Medical Division, Correggio, Italy )with an incorporated Doppler probe is used to detected the six terminal branches of the superior rectal artery which are ligated above the dentate line, then a running suture is performed in order to obtain a mucopexy

Timeline

• Start date: 2010-07-01
• Primary completion: 2011-04-01
• Completion: 2012-04-01
• First posted: 2010-12-20
• Last updated: 2015-01-22

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Italy