Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Terminated

TerminatedNCT01257659

STARR Trans-anal Resection Versus Vaginal Rectocele Repair Using Elevate: Effects on Defecatory Function

STARR Type Trans-anal Resection Versus Vaginal Rectocele Repair Using a Posterier Elevate Prothesis: a Randomized, Multicentric, Prospective Study on Defecatory Function

Status
Terminated
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
4 (actual)
Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes · Academic / Other
Sex
Female
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The primary objective of this study is to compare the function results between two methods for surgically repairing rectoceles: vaginal versus endo-anal surgery. Our working hypothesis is that the relatively new type of endo-anal surgery will result in better voiding function compared to the traditional vaginal surgery.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDURESTARR rectocele repairThe STARR transanal stapling system is used to repair a rectocele.
PROCEDUREElevate mesh rectocele repairA posterior Elevate mesh is placed transvaginally to repair a rectocele.

Timeline

Start date
2011-09-01
Primary completion
2015-05-01
Completion
2015-05-01
First posted
2010-12-10
Last updated
2015-11-02

Locations

6 sites across 1 country: France

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01257659. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.

STARR Trans-anal Resection Versus Vaginal Rectocele Repair Using Elevate: Effects on Defecatory Function (NCT01257659) · Clinical Trials Directory