NCT01248819

Local Anesthetic Nebulization and Instillation for Pain Control After Laparoscopic Surgery

Double Blind Randomized Phase III Controlled Trial Comparing the Effect of Intraperitoneal Nebulization of Ropivacaine With Intraperitoneal Instillation of Ropivacaine on Pain Control After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 3
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 60 (actual)
• Sponsor: San Gerardo Hospital · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 70 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

Studies evaluating intraperitoneal local anesthetic instillation for pain relief after laparoscopic procedures have provided conflicting results. This randomized, double-blind study was designed to assess the effects of a novel intraperitoneal local anesthetic administration technique using nebulization on pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Detailed description

Studies evaluating intraperitoneal local anesthetic (LA) instillation for pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy have provided conflicting results. One of the factors that might contribute to failure of the instillation technique may be related to inadequate distribution of local anesthetic throughout the peritoneal surface. In contrast, nebulization should provide a uniform spread of drugs throughout the peritoneal cavity and thus may be beneficial to improve pain relief after laparoscopic procedures. A recent study reported that bupivacaine nebulization significantly reduced pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with bupivacaine instillation in the gallbladder bed. However, these investigators used a custom-made nebulization system that needs a separate gas source and tubing that is cumbersome and may not be easily available. Recently, the investigators reported that a microvibration-based nebulization device (Aeroneb Pro® system, Aerogen, Galway, Ireland) could be used for ropivacaine delivery into the insufflation gas required to create pneumorpeitoneum. The investigators hypothesized that intraperitoneal ropivacaine nebulization would provide superior pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy than intraperitoneal ropivacaine instillation. This randomized, double blind, controlled clinical trial was designed to assess the analgesic efficacy of ropivacaine nebulization using the Aeroneb Pro® device laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with intraperitoneal ropivacaine instillation.

Conditions

• Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DRUG	Ropivacaine 60 mg	Nebulization grou received intraperitoneal instillation of saline 20 ml on the gall bladder after induction of pneumoperitoneum but before dissection of gall bladder plus intraperitoneal nebulization of ropivacaine 1% 3 ml (30 mg) the start of gall bladder dissection and again at the end of surgery just before deflation of pneumoperitoneum (total of 60 mg). The first ropivacaine nebulization was performed over 5-6 minutes using the Aeroneb Pro® device through the umbilical port while the other ports were being inserted, while second nebulization was performed before the withdrawal of the ports
DRUG	Ropivacaine 100 mg	Instillation group received intraperitoneal instillation of ropivacaine 0.5%, 20 ml (100 mg) on the gall bladder after induction of pneumoperitoneum but before dissection of gall bladder plus and intraperitoneal nebulization of normal saline 3 ml before the start of gall bladder dissection and again at the end of surgery just before deflation of pneumoperitoneum. The first saline nebulization was performed over 5-6 minutes using the Aeroneb Pro® device through the umbilical port while the other ports were being inserted, while second nebulization was performed before the withdrawal of the ports

Timeline

• Start date: 2008-04-01
• Primary completion: 2009-05-01
• Completion: 2009-05-01
• First posted: 2010-11-25
• Last updated: 2010-11-25

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Italy