NCT01247740

Comparison of Three-chamber-bag Versus Compounded Bag

A Prospective, Controlled, Randomized, Blinded, Parallel Group Multicentre Study on the Safety and Efficacy of a Convenience Three-chamber Bag for Parenteral Nutrition in Post-operative Patients After Abdominal Surgery Versus a Compounded Monobag

• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 3
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 240 (actual)
• Sponsor: B. Braun Melsungen AG · Industry
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 85 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The purpose of the study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of a convenient 3-chamber-bag containing aminoacids, glucose and lipid emulsion (LCT/MCT 20%) compared to a conventionally compounded monobag for parenteral nutrition.

Conditions

• Parenteral Nutrition for Patients With Proven Insufficient Enteral Resorption

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DRUG	NuTRIflex Lipid peri	parenteral nutrition
DRUG	compounded monobag	parenteral nutrition

Timeline

• Start date: 2010-10-01
• Primary completion: 2011-10-01
• Completion: 2011-10-01
• First posted: 2010-11-24
• Last updated: 2012-01-10

Locations

1 site across 1 country: China