Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01247389
Incisional Hernia After Midline Versus Transverse Extraction Incision in Laparoscopic Colectomy
Incisional Hernia After Midline Versus Transverse Extraction Incision in Laparoscopic Colectomy: A Pilot Randomized Trial
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 165 (actual)
- Sponsor
- McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Incisional hernia (IH) is a common complication of midline laparotomy. Despite the hope that laparoscopic colon resection would result in fewer incisional hernias, prospective studies demonstrate a similar incidence to open surgery. Observational studies suggest that the rate of incisional hernia after laparoscopic colon resection may be reduced with the use of a transverse compared to a midline extraction incision. However, no randomized trails are available, and a midline extraction incision for hemicolectomy remains the standard current approach. The investigators hypothesize that the use of a lower abdominal transverse muscle splitting incision for specimen extraction in laparoscopic colon surgery will result in fewer incisional hernias compared to a midline periumbilical extraction incision.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | laparoscopic colectomy | Laparoscopic segmental colectomy with planned abdominal extraction site |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2011-07-01
- Primary completion
- 2016-12-01
- Completion
- 2016-12-01
- First posted
- 2010-11-24
- Last updated
- 2018-08-15
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Canada
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01247389. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.