Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT01231737
Efficacy of Two Prophylactic Schedules (Prulifloxacin Versus Phosphomycin)
Efficacy of Prulifloxacin vs Phosphomycin in the Prophylasy of Urinary Tract Infection
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 96 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- University Of Perugia · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- 18 Years – 75 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Epidemiological studies showed that 20-30% of patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infections risked recurrent infection. Urinary tract infection causes marked discomfort for the patient, has a negative impact upon quality of life, and is associated with high social and health costs in terms of specialist appointments, laboratory and instrumental tests and prescriptions . Although diverse cycles of antibiotic therapy and prophylaxis have been proposed, doubts persist about the most efficacious pharmacological agents, duration of prophylaxis , the incidence of adverse effects and relapse when antibiotic therapy is suspended. Aims of the study: 1. To compare the efficacy of two prophylactic schedules (Prulifloxacin vs Phosphomycin): * in reducing the number of urinary tract infection episodes during prophylaxis * in reducing the number of urinary tract infection episodes after prophylaxis * in improving the patient's quality of life . 2. To assess : * Tolerability of antibiotic prophylaxis * The incidence of resistance to antibiotic therapy
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | prulifloxacin | Prulifloxacin 1 tablet/week for 12 weeks. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2010-11-01
- Primary completion
- 2011-02-01
- Completion
- 2012-02-01
- First posted
- 2010-11-01
- Last updated
- 2010-11-01
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01231737. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.