Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01217567
Subcuticular Suture Versus Staples for Closure of the Skin After Caesarean Section.
Subcuticular Suture Versus Staples for Closure of the Skin After Caesarean Section: A Prospective Randomized Single-blinded Case-Control Study With the Case as it's Own Control.
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 60 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Holbaek Sygehus · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
The Purpose of this study is to compare two methods for closure of the skin after caesarean section on the same patient; staples and subcuticular sutures. The study is performed on two separate groups of patients: 1. Woman having cesarean section for the first time and have not previously had abdominal surgery through a lower abdominal transverse incision. 2. Woman, who have previously had a caesarean section done. The following parameters are registered: 1. An objective evaluation of the two ends of the scar 6 months postoperatively. 2. A patient evaluation of the two ends of the scar 6 months postoperatively. 3. The difference in pain in the two ends of the scar 1 day postoperatively (blinded). 4. The difference in pain in the two ends of the scar 7 days, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. 5. The rate of infection.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Staples left, subcuticular suture right | Closure of the skin after cesarean section with staples on the left side of the wound and subcuticular suture on the right side. |
| PROCEDURE | Subcuticular suture left side and staples right | Closure of the skin after cesarean section with staples on the right side of the wound and subcuticular suture on the left side. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2010-03-01
- Primary completion
- 2011-07-01
- Completion
- 2012-01-01
- First posted
- 2010-10-08
- Last updated
- 2012-02-08
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Denmark
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01217567. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.