Trials / Terminated
TerminatedNCT01195285
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Traditional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Traditional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Prospective Trial
- Status
- Terminated
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 87 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Saint Luke's Health System · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 80 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This study will compare Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) cholecystectomy to traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), focusing on patient-reported outcomes and cost.
Detailed description
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) is accepted as a form of surgical treatment. Traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TLC) is well tolerated, with a low complication risk and high patient satisfaction; thus a SILS procedure needs to be at least equivalent to be a justifiable replacement, and should not result in higher costs.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery cholecystectomy | Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
| PROCEDURE | Traditional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (TLC) | Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2010-02-01
- Primary completion
- 2012-01-01
- Completion
- 2012-01-01
- First posted
- 2010-09-06
- Last updated
- 2012-04-30
Locations
1 site across 1 country: United States
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01195285. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.