Trials / Active Not Recruiting
Active Not RecruitingNCT01194817
A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented and Cementless Total Knee Replacement
A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented and Cementless Total Knee Replacement: Results of a New Modular Trabecular Metal Tibial Component Using the NexGen System
- Status
- Active Not Recruiting
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 100 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 75 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the the Nexgen knee replacement system using cementless fixation with the same system using cemented fixation. At minimum 2-year follow-up, the hypothesis is that NexGen total knee arthroplasties using cementless and cemented fixation will demonstrate no differences in clinical outcome based on Oxford and Knee Society scores, patient-assessed visual analog pain, clinical complications, radiographic fixation and implant survivorship.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | High-Flexion Knee Replacement System using Cemented Fixation | |
| DEVICE | High-Flexion Knee Replacement System using Cementless Fixation |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2010-04-01
- Primary completion
- 2026-12-01
- Completion
- 2026-12-01
- First posted
- 2010-09-03
- Last updated
- 2023-07-24
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01194817. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.