Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01190397
Warming Efficiency of Warm Compresses Versus BLEPHASTEAM® in Eyelid Therapy
Phase I, Prospective, Comparative Study, Investigator Masked , Monocentric Measuring Warming Efficiency and Safety of Blephasteam® Versus Warm Compresses in Eyelid Therapy
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 20 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Laboratoires Thea · Industry
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 4 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
The eyelid warming device is designed to relieve the symptoms of dysfunction of the glands in the eyelids Phase I, prospective, comparative study, investigator masked , monocentric Objectives are To assess and compare the warming and moisture of Blephasteam® device versus the warming and moisture of warm and moist compresses. To assess and compare safety on the ocular surface after 10 minutes of Blephasteam® application versus after 10 minutes of warm and moist compresses application
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Warming goggles | |
| DEVICE | warm and moist compresses |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2010-09-01
- Primary completion
- 2010-11-01
- Completion
- 2010-11-01
- First posted
- 2010-08-27
- Last updated
- 2010-12-06
Locations
1 site across 1 country: United Kingdom
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01190397. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.