Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT01136447

Continuous Infraclavicular Blocks: Neurostimulation Versus Ultrasound

Success Rate of Infra-clavicular Blocks: Comparison of Ultrasound Versus Neurostimulation Guided Catheter Placement

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
210 (actual)
Sponsor
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether ultrasound guidance or nerve stimulation is the best option for placing continuous peripheral nerve block catheters for upper limb surgery.

Detailed description

In a multidisciplinary, observer blinded, prospective, single center, randomized study, success rate of US guided versus neurostimulation guided catheter placement for continuous infraclavicular block in patients scheduled for upper limb surgery will be studied. Block effectiveness, time taken, discharge from recovery, postoperative pain and disability and patient acceptance will be studied in 210 patients.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREUltrasoundBlock catheter will be introduced using ultraosound

Timeline

Start date
2010-01-01
Primary completion
2013-01-01
Completion
2013-02-01
First posted
2010-06-03
Last updated
2017-08-30

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Canada

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01136447. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.

Continuous Infraclavicular Blocks: Neurostimulation Versus Ultrasound (NCT01136447) · Clinical Trials Directory