Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT01117337

Comparing Non-fixation of Mesh to Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair

Comparing Non-fixation of Mesh to Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair Under Spinal Anesthesia- A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
104 (actual)
Sponsor
Moulana Hospital · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
16 Years – 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The purpose of the study is 1. To compare the recurrence rate of the laparoscopic total extra peritoneal inguinal hernia repair without fixation of the mesh to mesh fixation under spinal anesthesia 2. To test whether non-fixation of mesh leads to less pain compared to the repair when the mesh is fixed.

Detailed description

Hernia repair is one of the most common surgery performed all over the world. The same is true about India. With more than a billion population, the number of hernia patients in India perhaps run in millions. The laparoscopic repair is increasingly becoming popular in India. Decreased post operative pain and lesser morbidity are the main advantages of Total Extra Peritoneal Repair (TEP) over open hernia repair. Laparoscopic hernia repair is now recommended as the method of choice for bilateral and recurrent inguinal hernias. The disadvantages of TEP are requirement of general anesthesia (GA), need to fix the mesh, seroma formation and difficult learning curve. Fixation of mesh with metal staples, apart from increasing the cost, may lead to new post operative groin pain which even becomes chronic in small percentage of patients. This had led to various studies showing that the non-fixation of mesh is safe, cost effective and lead to no increased risk of hernia recurrence compared to the conventional open hernia repair. Requirement of GA for TEP repair also had several disadvantages compared to regional anesthesia such as significant hemodynamic changes, delayed recovery, post operative nausea and vomiting, increased cost and inability to give anesthesia in high cardio-pulmonary risk patients. Several studies in recent past have demonstrated TEP is feasible and safe in regional anesthesia (epidural or spinal) as well. We earlier reported that TEP repair could be done without fixation of the mesh under regional anesthesia. This study is a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) comparing the outcome of non-fixation of mesh during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with fixation of mesh under spinal anesthesia. The end points measured would be the recurrence of the hernia and pain in the post operative period.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREMesh FixationLaparoscopic Total extraperitoneal repair of Inguinal hernia under Spinal Anesthesia - Mesh is not fixed to any structure

Timeline

Start date
2008-09-01
Primary completion
2010-05-01
Completion
2010-05-01
First posted
2010-05-05
Last updated
2010-08-31
Results posted
2010-08-31

Locations

1 site across 1 country: India

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01117337. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.