NCT01070420

Comparison of Hyperemic Efficacy Between Central and Peripheral Adenosine Infusion for Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Measurement

• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 4
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 66 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Seoul National University Hospital · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: —
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the peripheral IV continuous infusion without the insertion of central venous vascular access method in the achievement of steady-state maximal coronary hyperemia compared with the central IV continuous infusion method.

Conditions

• Coronary Artery Disease
• Myocardial Ischemia

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
OTHER	FFR via central venous line	Patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis were consecutively enrolled. FFR was measured by a standard intravenous (IV) adenosine infusion (140 μg•min-1•kg-1) via Rt central femoral vein.
OTHER	FFR via peripheral venous line	Patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis were consecutively enrolled. FFR was measured by a standard intravenous (IV) adenosine infusion (140 μg•min-1•kg-1) via continuous peripheral vein.

Timeline

• Start date: 2009-12-01
• Primary completion: 2011-04-01
• Completion: 2011-05-01
• First posted: 2010-02-18
• Last updated: 2011-07-18

Locations

1 site across 1 country: South Korea