Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT01047826

M.I.P.O. vs Intramedullary Nailing in Tibia Fractures

Intramedullary Nailing vs. M.I.P.O. in Fractures of the Tibia a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Unknown
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
180 (estimated)
Sponsor
King Abdullah International Medical Research Center · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The investigators are comparing two methods of standard treatments in distal tibial fractures. locked plating (M.I.P.O. technique) with intramedullary nailing. the investigators are hypothesizing that M.I.P.O group is superior to nailing in fractures of the distal third of the tibia.

Detailed description

The kind of plates the investigators are comparing are the Locked plates form Synthes ® using the minimally invasive technique vs the Expert Tibial Nail® from Synthes ®

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREMinimally Invasive Plate OsteosynthesisFractures well be treated with locked plates using M.I.P.O. Technique
PROCEDUREintramedullary tibial NailingFractures well be fixed using intramedullary nails

Timeline

Start date
2010-12-01
Primary completion
2013-12-01
Completion
2014-12-01
First posted
2010-01-13
Last updated
2011-06-23

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Saudi Arabia

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01047826. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.

M.I.P.O. vs Intramedullary Nailing in Tibia Fractures (NCT01047826) · Clinical Trials Directory