Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Terminated

TerminatedNCT01044589

Comparison of the Efficacy of a Biological Implant to Reinforce Overlapping Sphincter Repair Versus Overlapping Sphincter Repair Alone

Status
Terminated
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
13 (actual)
Sponsor
Massarat Zutshi · Academic / Other
Sex
Female
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of Biodesign™ Surgisis® Tissue Graft to reinforce an overlapping sphincter repair versus the standard overlapping sphincter repair in controlling episodes of incontinence in patients who have fecal incontinence and a defect in the anal sphincter.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEBiodesign Tissue Repair GraftBiodesign Tissue Repair Graft reinforcement
OTHEROverlapping Sphincter RepairOverlapping Sphincter Repair Alone

Timeline

Start date
2010-05-01
Primary completion
2014-12-01
Completion
2014-12-01
First posted
2010-01-08
Last updated
2017-08-01
Results posted
2017-08-01

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01044589. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.

Comparison of the Efficacy of a Biological Implant to Reinforce Overlapping Sphincter Repair Versus Overlapping Sphincte (NCT01044589) · Clinical Trials Directory