Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01019213
Acute and Chronic Effect of His-pacing in Consecutive Patients With AV-block
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 40 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Aarhus University Hospital Skejby · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Conventional right ventricular (RV) apical pacing may result in asynchronous ventricular contraction with delayed left ventricular activation, interventricular motion abnormalities, and worsening of left ventricular ejection fraction. His pacing is preserving a synchronous contraction and may prevent a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction. Hypothesis: His-pacing preserves left ventricular function and is a feasable alternative compared to RV septal septal pacing in patients with AV-block.
Detailed description
Conventional right ventricular apical pacing may result in asynchronous ventricular contraction with delayed left ventricular activation, interventricular motion abnormalities, and worsening of left ventricular ejection fraction. His pacing is preserving a synchronous contraction and may prevent a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction. The aims of our crossover, double-blinded, randomized study is to evaluate the feasibility and long-term safety of permanent His pacing and to compare the effects on left ventricular ejection fraction of permanent His pacing with those of conventional right septal stimulation after 12 months treatment in patients with 2nd or 3rd degree AV-block.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OTHER | Septal pacing | Septal lead activated |
| OTHER | His lead activated | His lead will be activated 80 ms before septal lead |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2007-09-01
- Primary completion
- 2011-09-01
- Completion
- 2011-09-01
- First posted
- 2009-11-25
- Last updated
- 2012-05-15
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Denmark
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01019213. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.