Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT01011543

Induced Sputum Versus Bronchoscopy in Smear Negative Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Comparison of Induced Sputum and Bronchoscopic Approach (BAL, Fluoroscopy-guided Transbronchial Biopsies) in Patients Suspected of Pulmonary Tuberculosis With Negative Direct Exam on Three Consecutive Non-induced Sputum Samples

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
160 (actual)
Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

This is a randomised study that compares different diagnostic approaches for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis in patients suspected of pulmonary tuberculosis in whom the three classic (non-induced) sputum samples didn't show tuberculous bacillus on direct examination. The investigators compare the sensibility of induced sputum technique with an endoscopic approach (CT-scan followed by BAL and fluoroscopy-guided transbronchial biopsies and eventually sputum collection immediately after the bronchoscopy). People in high risk population for tuberculosis undergoing screening by chest X-ray or symptomatic patients will be admitted to the hospital if their chest X-ray shows a suspicion of active tuberculosis. According good clinical practice: (non-induced) sputum samples will be taken at admission and every following morning. If direct examination and PCR of the first three classic sputum samples are negative: patients will be randomised in two groups with a different diagnostic approach (induced sputum versus endoscopic approach) The aim of our study is to proof that a thoroughgoing endoscopic approach has a higher sensibility than an induced sputum in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in patients with a high suspicion of active tuberculosis on the chest X-ray but with a negative direct examination and/or PCR on three consecutive normal sputum samples. The investigators will include 154 patients (based on a statistical analysis for a hypothesis that the endoscopic approach has a sensibility that's twice the sensibility of the induced sputum). * first arm: 2 consecutive induced sputum using an ultrasonic nebulizer. * second arm: CT thorax to evaluate the exact anatomic localisation of the disease followed by fluoroscopy-guided bronchoscopy for BAL (bronchoalveolar lavage) and transbronchial biopsies. A sputum sample immediately after the endoscopy will be collected if possible.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREDiagnostic techniques in pulmonary tuberculosisTwo different methods to obtain a diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in patients with negative classic sputum samples are compared.

Timeline

Start date
2009-08-01
Primary completion
2015-12-01
Completion
2015-12-01
First posted
2009-11-11
Last updated
2018-08-03

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Belgium

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01011543. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.