Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT00995371
Study of Epidural Steroid Injection (ESI) Versus Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression (Mild®) in Patients With Symptomatic Lumbar Central Canal Stenosis
Comparative Study of Epidural Steroid Injection Versus Mild® (Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression) Procedure in Patients Diagnosed With Symptomatic Moderate to Severe Lumbar Central Canal Stenosis
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 38 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Coastal Orthopedics & Sports Medicine · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This is a single-center, randomized, prospective, double-blind clinical study to assess the clinical application and outcomes with MILD® devices versus epidural steroid injection in patients with symptomatic moderate to severe central canal spinal stenosis.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | MILD® (Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression) | Image guided minimally-invasive lumbar decompression performed with arthroscopic devices. |
| DRUG | Epidural Steroid Injection | An Epidural Steroid Injection is injected into the space around the spinal cord and nerve roots called epidural space. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2009-08-01
- Primary completion
- 2012-06-01
- Completion
- 2013-05-01
- First posted
- 2009-10-15
- Last updated
- 2013-11-15
- Results posted
- 2013-11-15
Locations
1 site across 1 country: United States
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00995371. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.