Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT00975858

Long-term Comparison of Stenting Versus Off-pump Coronary Bypass Surgery

A Randomized Comparison of Long-term Clinical , Neurocognitive, Angiographical and Health-costs, After Stenting Versus Off-pump Coronary Bypass Surgery in Patients With Symptomatic Coronary Artery Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
280 (actual)
Sponsor
UMC Utrecht · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The randomized comparison of two strategies in coronary revascularization: bypass surgery without the use of a heart lung machine and coronary stenting procedure. The comparison comprised the occurrence of cardiac adverse events after the procedure. In addition, costs, cognitive outcomes and angiography were assessed.

Detailed description

Coronary artery bypass surgery with use of the heart lung machine (on-pump surgery), is associated with the risk of peri-operative complications such as death, stroke, myocardial infarction, neurocognitive decline, and extended hospitalization. Bypass surgery on the beating heart without the use of the heart lung machine (off-pump surgery) has been reintroduced in clinical practice in order to reduce these complications. The Octopus cardiac wall stabilizer, developed at the UMC Utrecht, facilitates the safe construction of the grafts during the off-pump procedure. The expected advantages of off-pump surgery e.g. less-invasiveness, complete arterial revascularization, faster recovery and lower costs were the basis for the Octostent trial. We hypothesized that the off-pump surgical technique might offer an alternative for angioplasty with bare-metal stent-implantation. The current study was designed as a randomized controlled multicenter trial comparing two strategies.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDURECoronary Revascularizationrevascularization of coronary arteries in case of symptomatic obstructive coronary artery disease

Timeline

Start date
1998-01-01
Primary completion
2001-01-01
Completion
2001-02-01
First posted
2009-09-14
Last updated
2009-09-15

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Netherlands

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00975858. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.