Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT00973609
Optimal Maintenance Therapy With Bevacizumab After Induction in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (CRC)
Randomized Three Arm Phase III Trial on Induction Treatment With a Fluoropyrimidine-, Oxaliplatin- and Bevacizumab-based Chemotherapy for 24 Weeks Followed by Maintenance Treatment With a Fluoropyrimidine and Bevacizumab vs. Bevacizumab Alone vs. no Maintenance Treatment and Reinduction in Case of Progression for First-line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 853 (actual)
- Sponsor
- AIO-Studien-gGmbH · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Investigating the efficacy of maintenance and reinduction treatment or no treatment and watchful waiting in subjects with inoperable or irresectable and non-progressive metastatic colorectal cancer after first line induction treatment for 24 weeks with a fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- and bevacizumab-based chemotherapy. The maintenance treatment with capecitabine or 5-FU/folinic acid and bevacizumab will be compared with a maintenance treatment with bevacizumab alone or no maintenance treatment. Reinduction treatment will be done in case of progression.
Detailed description
Chemotherapy and bevacizumab represent a standard of care in treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Until now, continuation of chemotherapy - and bevacizumab - represents the standard of care in colorectal cancer treatment. However, since the OPTIMOX1 trial showed an equivalent duration of disease control for a de-escalation / maintenance / reintroduction strategy compared with a treatment until progression strategy for oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, the question is whether this strategy might apply also to bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy. Furthermore, with the introduction of bevacizumab, there are new options for a maintenance treatment which should be evaluated. As the continuation of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab until disease progression has to be regarded as standard of care, the question is whether a de-escalation of treatment intensity or even withdrawal of treatment ("drug holiday") after a certain treatment period will not be inferior with respect to resulting time with tumor control, but allow patients a period with less toxicity and gain of quality of life.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | 5-Fluorouracil, Folic acid, Capecitabine; Bevacizumab | Induction (and reinduction) treatment regimen for 24 weeks: Fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin and bevacizumab. Following induction treatment regimen (for maintenance treatment): No maintenance treatment. |
| DRUG | 5-Fluorouracil, Folic acid, Capecitabine; Bevacizumab | Induction (and reinduction) treatment regimen for 24 weeks: Fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin and bevacizumab. Following induction treatment regimen (for maintenance treatment): Fluoropyrimidine + Bevacizumab. |
| DRUG | 5-Fluorouracil, Folic acid, Capecitabine; Bevacizumab | Induction (and reinduction) treatment regimen for 24 weeks: Fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin and bevacizumab. Following induction treatment regimen (for maintenance treatment): Bevacizumab monotherapy. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2009-08-01
- Primary completion
- 2014-12-01
- Completion
- 2015-08-01
- First posted
- 2009-09-09
- Last updated
- 2015-09-01
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Germany
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00973609. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.