NCT00959205

The Efficacy and Safety of CARTO 3D Mapping System Versus Conventional Method in AF and VT

Phase Ⅳ Study of CARTO 3D Mapping System vs Conventional Method in AF & VT

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: Phase 4
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 160 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Korea University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 20 Years – 85 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroanatomic imaging compared to conventional method in patients with VT.

Detailed description

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroanatomic imaging (CARTO) compared to conventional fluoroscopically guided activation mapping (Conventional) method in patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Substrate-dependent Ventricular Tachycardia To evaluate cost-effectiveness of CARTO 3D image system compared to conventional method in the same study subjects

Conditions

• Atrial Fibrillation

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DEVICE	CARTO 3D	CARTO (3D Electroanatomic imaging)
DEVICE	Angiography	Conventional fluoroscopically guided activation mapping

Timeline

• Start date: 2009-07-01
• Primary completion: 2010-06-01
• Completion: 2011-02-01
• First posted: 2009-08-14
• Last updated: 2010-05-20

Locations

5 sites across 1 country: South Korea