Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT00931359
Efficacy and Safety of the DTS-G2 System in Patients With Axillary Hyperhidrosis
A Prospective, Multicenter, Parallel, Randomized, Blinded Study of the Efficacy and Safety of the DTS-G2 System in Patients With Axillary Hyperhidrosis
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 120 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Miramar Labs · Industry
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This is a prospective, multi-center, parallel, randomized, blinded study. The study has two groups, where in one study group the subjects receive treatment for axillary hyperhidrosis (excessive underarm sweating) with the DTS-G2 System in both axilla ("treatment group"). The other study group receives a sham treatment in both axilla where the subjects will have the same procedure performed but no energy from the device will be applied ("sham group"). Subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio (treatment group: sham group). Subjects enrolled in the study will be blinded regarding which study group they are in. The study hypothesis is that subjects that receive the treatment will have a reduction in underarm sweating compared to those in the sham group, as measured by a quality of life questionnaire. All subjects will undergo follow up assessments at 14 days, 30 days, 3 months and 6 months post final treatment session. Subjects randomized to the treatment group will also have follow-up visits at 9 months and 12 months post final treatment session.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | DTS-G2 System | Treatment with microwave energy |
| DEVICE | DTS System (Sham treatment) | Sham treatment - no energy is delivered |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2009-06-01
- Primary completion
- 2009-12-01
- Completion
- 2010-12-01
- First posted
- 2009-07-02
- Last updated
- 2011-06-15
- Results posted
- 2011-06-14
Locations
7 sites across 1 country: United States
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00931359. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.