Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT00929175

Antihypertensive Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Resistant Hypertensive Patients With Sleep Apnea

Antihypertensive Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) in Resistant Hypertensive Patients With Sleep Apnea: Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45 (actual)
Sponsor
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
30 Years – 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) has been linked to resistant hypertension, but the effect of treatment of OSAS on the resistant hypertension have no been established. In a double-blind randomized clinical trial patients with resistant hypertension with at least moderate sleep apnea will be randomized to receive therapeutic CPAP or Placebo CPAP for eight weeks in an ambulatory set. The investigators want to determine any difference on hypertension control between the 2 management strategies.

Detailed description

This is a double blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial. Participants were consecutive patients with resistant hypertension, defined as uncontrolled BP, despite the concurrent use of 3 or more antihypertensive agents, including a diuretic, with adherence to treatment and without white coat phenomenon. All participants should have a diagnosis of at least moderate OSAS, defined by AHI \> 15 in a portable monitoring sleep exam. Participants were assigned to active CPAP or sham-CPAP. The main outcome was change in 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring values from baseline to two months of active CPAP or sham CPAP

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEactive CPAPauto-PAP with pressure between 6 and 12 cm H2O or sham CPAP will be administered to randomized patients
DEVICEsham-CPAPThe sham-CPAP was the same equipment used for active CPAP (Respironics Remstar-Auto, Murraysville, PA) fixed in the lowest pressure (4cmH2) and modified as recommended by Farré et al. The differences between the two were undetectable except for the pressure generated in the facial mask in the sham-CPAP that was no greater than 1cm H2O.

Timeline

Start date
2008-02-01
Primary completion
2013-04-01
Completion
2013-04-01
First posted
2009-06-26
Last updated
2014-02-25

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Brazil

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00929175. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.