Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT00925665
Intubation of Patients With Odontogenic Abcesses
Intubation of Patients With Odontogenic Abcesses Glidescope vs. Macintosh Technique
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- —
- Study type
- Observational
- Enrollment
- 100 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Kliniken Essen-Mitte · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This study is a comparison of two techniques for endotracheal intubation (Glidescope versus Macintosh) in patients with odontogenic abscesses.
Detailed description
Patients with odontogenic abcesses have to be treated by surgical drainage of the abscess under general intubation with endotracheal intubation. Because of a limited mouth opening and swelling within the oral cavity, intubation can be difficult and sometimes impossible with conventional direct laryngoscopy. Therefore, alternative techniques are desirable. We want to compare the success rate of intubation in these patients using the Glidescope technique vs. conventional Macintosh technique.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Glidescope | Patients are to be intubated using the Glidescope technique |
| DEVICE | Macintosh laryngoscope | Patients are to be intubated using direct laryngoscopy with a Macintosh laryngoscope |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2009-01-01
- Primary completion
- 2011-03-01
- Completion
- 2011-06-01
- First posted
- 2009-06-22
- Last updated
- 2011-06-28
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Germany
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00925665. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.