NCT00890578

HISTOACRYL: A Study of Its Efficacy in Final Scar Formation

It is Our Intent to Conduct a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Use of Histoacryl© in the Closure of Surgical Incisions in Comparison to Subcuticular Suture and to Dermabond©.

• Status: Completed
• Phase: —
• Study type: Observational
• Enrollment: 21 (actual)
• Sponsor: Mayo Clinic · Academic / Other
• Sex: Female
• Age: 21 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

The use of tissue adhesives for the closure of surgical incisions is becoming increasingly common. Several publications exist purporting the equivalence of tissue adhesive to suture with regard to dehiscence, infection, and cosmesis. Two of the most frequently used adhesives are Histoacryl© and Dermabond©. Despite their popularity, only one study exists comparing the two. In this non-English study only small wounds in an exclusively pediatric population were studied (12). Operative time, cost, and objective measures of scar size were not examined. In the present study we aim to evaluate the relatively large surgical incisions resulting from breast reduction, mastopexy, panniculectomy, and abdominoplasty closed with either Histoacryl©, Dermabond©, or subcuticular suture. The primary aim is to investigate differences in time to wound closure. Secondary aims are to compare the three approaches with respect to cost, dehiscence, infection, scar size, and cosmesis.

Conditions

• Surgical Incisions

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	adhesive to suture	surgical closure

Timeline

• Start date: 2009-04-01
• Primary completion: 2011-02-01
• Completion: 2011-02-01
• First posted: 2009-04-30
• Last updated: 2012-06-21

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States