Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT00880945
Conventional Bronchoscopy Plus Rose Versus Electromagnetic Navigation (EMN) Plus Rose in Small Peripheral Lesions
Comparison of the Electromagnetic Navigation System and Rapid on Site Evaluation Versus Conventional Bronchoscopy and Rapid on Site Evaluation: Improved Yield in Small Peripheral Lung Lesions(Original Investigation)
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- —
- Study type
- Observational
- Enrollment
- 40 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della Carita · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 80 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate if Electromagnetic navigation (ENB) in combination with rapid on site evaluation (ROSE) can improve diagnostic accuracy in those patients who fail to be diagnosed with conventional fluoroscopic assisted bronchoscopy (FBS) in combination with ROSE.
Conditions
Timeline
- Start date
- 2009-05-01
- Primary completion
- 2010-04-01
- Completion
- 2010-05-01
- First posted
- 2009-04-14
- Last updated
- 2009-04-14
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Italy
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00880945. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.