Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT00880945

Conventional Bronchoscopy Plus Rose Versus Electromagnetic Navigation (EMN) Plus Rose in Small Peripheral Lesions

Comparison of the Electromagnetic Navigation System and Rapid on Site Evaluation Versus Conventional Bronchoscopy and Rapid on Site Evaluation: Improved Yield in Small Peripheral Lung Lesions(Original Investigation)

Status
Unknown
Phase
Study type
Observational
Enrollment
40 (estimated)
Sponsor
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della Carita · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate if Electromagnetic navigation (ENB) in combination with rapid on site evaluation (ROSE) can improve diagnostic accuracy in those patients who fail to be diagnosed with conventional fluoroscopic assisted bronchoscopy (FBS) in combination with ROSE.

Conditions

Timeline

Start date
2009-05-01
Primary completion
2010-04-01
Completion
2010-05-01
First posted
2009-04-14
Last updated
2009-04-14

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Italy

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00880945. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.

Conventional Bronchoscopy Plus Rose Versus Electromagnetic Navigation (EMN) Plus Rose in Small Peripheral Lesions (NCT00880945) · Clinical Trials Directory