Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT00825812
Comparison of 2.0 mg/kg Sugammadex and Neostigmine at Reappearance of T2 in Chinese and European Subjects (Study 19.4.324)(P05768AM1)(COMPLETED)
A Multi-center, Randomized, Parallel-group, Active-controlled, Safety-assessor Blinded Trial, Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of 2.0 mg.Kg-1 Sugammadex With 50 μg.Kg-1 Neostigmine Administered at Reappearance of T2 After Rocuronium in Chinese and European ASA I-III Subjects Undergoing Elective Surgery Under Propofol Anesthesia
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 308 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC · Industry
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 64 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The present trial was set up to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2.0 mg.kg-1 sugammadex compared to neostigmine administered at reappearance of T2 in Chinese and Caucasian subjects for registration purposes in China.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Sugammadex | After induction of anesthesia an intubation dose of 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium was administered. Maintenance doses of 0.1-0.2 mg/kg rocuronium intravenous (IV) could be administered if necessary. At reappearance of T2 after the last administration of rocuronium, an IV single bolus dose of 2.0 mg/kg sugammadex was administered. |
| DRUG | neostigmine | After induction of anesthesia an intubation dose of 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium was administered. Maintenance doses of 0.1-0.2 mg/kg rocuronium IV could be administered if necessary. At reappearance of T2 after the last administration of rocuronium, an IV single bolus dose of 50 µg/kg neostigmine (combined with 10-20 μg.kg-1 atropine, in a ratio ranging from 2.5:1 to 5:1) was administered. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2010-01-01
- Primary completion
- 2010-09-01
- Completion
- 2010-09-01
- First posted
- 2009-01-21
- Last updated
- 2015-11-02
- Results posted
- 2011-08-18
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00825812. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.