Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT00758888
Effect of Orthopedic Blocking on Cervical Spine Flexion and Extension Strength
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 30 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Logan College of Chiropractic · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 30 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
A few studies concerning the effects of joint manipulation have shown muscle responses distal to the site of manipulation. The purpose of this study is to determine if pelvic orthopedic blocking, a low force method of manipulating the sacroiliac joint, can have produce changes to cervical spine function.
Detailed description
All mechanoreceptor types are found in diarthrodial joints. Mechanoreceptor afferents have reflexive connections to motor neurons. Stimulation of muscle and joint afferents are known to produce reflexive muscle changes. Orthopedic blocking applies a gentle compression to the sacroiliac joints. The current study seeks to determine if orthopedic blocking of the sacroiliac joint can affect cervical spine function thereby serving as a useful adjunctive procedure in the treatment of cervical spine joint dysfunction. The current study will compare pre \& post treatment cervical isometric strength readings from an orthopedic blocking group, a trochanter belt group (another type of compression), and a sham group.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Orthopedic Blocking | Place the blocks under the pelvis for 2 minutes |
| PROCEDURE | Trochanter Belt | Participant is fitted with trochanter belt on the adjusting table and wear it while Investigator checks their flexion and extension strength. |
| OTHER | Blocking Sham | Participant lies on adjusting table, blocks are placed in a similar configuration but distant to actual points of leverage. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2008-09-01
- Primary completion
- 2008-10-01
- Completion
- 2008-10-01
- First posted
- 2008-09-25
- Last updated
- 2009-07-24
Locations
1 site across 1 country: United States
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00758888. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.