Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT00745667
The LAMA Trial: Laparoscopic Correction of Perforated Peptic Ulcer Versus Open Correction
The LAMA Trial: Laparoscopic Correction of Perforated Peptic Ulcer Versus Open Correction by Upper Laparotomy
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 109 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Erasme University Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This is a multicenter trial comparing laparoscopic correction of a perforated peptic ulcer with the open technique by upper laparotomy. Hypothesis is that after laparoscopic correction will be discharged 3 days sooner due to less postoperative pain and complications.
Detailed description
as written above
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | laparoscopic surgery | laparoscopic correction perforated peptic ulcer |
| PROCEDURE | Upper laparotomy | upper laparotomy for correction of perforated peptic ulcer |
Timeline
- Start date
- 1999-07-01
- Primary completion
- 2006-12-01
- Completion
- 2007-01-01
- First posted
- 2008-09-03
- Last updated
- 2008-09-03
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Netherlands
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00745667. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.