Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT00712309
Endovascular Treatment of Popliteal Artery - Balloon Angioplasty Versus Primary Stenting
Endovascular Treatment of Atherosclerotic Popliteal Artery Lesions - Balloon Angioplasty Versus Primary Stenting
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 250 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Herz-Zentrums Bad Krozingen · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 80 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
1. Does primary stenting have a lower 12-month restenosis rate than PTA alone in the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions of the popliteal artery? * Alternative hypothesis: "Primary stenting with the Edwards LifeStent is associated with a lower restenosis rate than PTA alone in patients with atherosclerotic lesions of the popliteal artery at 12 months" * Null hypothesis: "Primary stenting with the Edwards LifeStent is not associated with a lower 12-month restenosis rate than PTA alone in patients with atherosclerotic lesions of the popliteal artery"" 2. Does comparison of the two intervention groups (PTA alone, stenting) disclose differences in terms of the secondary endpoints? 3. How do the intervention methods compare in terms of safety/incidence of adverse effects? 4. What are the long-term clinical implications of the two treatment methods?
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Lifestent | Stent for endovascular treatment of popliteal artery lesions |
| DEVICE | balloon-angioplasty (PTA) | PTA for endovascular treatment of popliteal artery lesions |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2007-02-01
- Primary completion
- 2010-06-01
- First posted
- 2008-07-09
- Last updated
- 2009-02-10
Locations
2 sites across 1 country: Germany
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00712309. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.