Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT00712309

Endovascular Treatment of Popliteal Artery - Balloon Angioplasty Versus Primary Stenting

Endovascular Treatment of Atherosclerotic Popliteal Artery Lesions - Balloon Angioplasty Versus Primary Stenting

Status
Unknown
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
250 (estimated)
Sponsor
Herz-Zentrums Bad Krozingen · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

1. Does primary stenting have a lower 12-month restenosis rate than PTA alone in the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions of the popliteal artery? * Alternative hypothesis: "Primary stenting with the Edwards LifeStent is associated with a lower restenosis rate than PTA alone in patients with atherosclerotic lesions of the popliteal artery at 12 months" * Null hypothesis: "Primary stenting with the Edwards LifeStent is not associated with a lower 12-month restenosis rate than PTA alone in patients with atherosclerotic lesions of the popliteal artery"" 2. Does comparison of the two intervention groups (PTA alone, stenting) disclose differences in terms of the secondary endpoints? 3. How do the intervention methods compare in terms of safety/incidence of adverse effects? 4. What are the long-term clinical implications of the two treatment methods?

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICELifestentStent for endovascular treatment of popliteal artery lesions
DEVICEballoon-angioplasty (PTA)PTA for endovascular treatment of popliteal artery lesions

Timeline

Start date
2007-02-01
Primary completion
2010-06-01
First posted
2008-07-09
Last updated
2009-02-10

Locations

2 sites across 1 country: Germany

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00712309. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.