Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT00686712
Insulin Glargine at Bedtime or in AM Versus NPH
The Utility of Insulin Glargine (Lantus) Compared to NPH in Ethnic Minority Type 2 Diabetic Subjects Starting Insulin Therapy
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 108 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Charles Drew University of Medicine and Science · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 75 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
To compare the efficacy and safety of once-nightly insulin glargine versus a single morning injection of glargine or once-nightly NPH insulin in ethnic minority type 2 diabetic patients inadequately controlled on combination oral agents.
Detailed description
Insulin glargine has a longer action than compared to NPH insulin, but whether this results in improved control when used as a once-nightly or morning basal insulin injection in type 2 diabetic patients who are inadequately controlled on combination oral agents has been controversial. Inner city ethnic minority patients with diabetes are a particularly challenging population of diabetic patients to treat. This study investigates whether insulin glargine may be a more effective or safer first-line basal insulin than NPH in this population.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | 1- Insulin glargine QHS | Insulin glargine at bedtime (dose titrated to maintain 50% of fasting glucose readings \<120 mg/dL) |
| DRUG | 2 - Insulin glargine QAM | Insulin glargine in AM (dose titrated to maintain 50% of pre-supper glucose readings \<120 mg/dL) |
| DRUG | 3 - NPH insulin QHS | NPH insulin at bedtime (dose titrated to maintain 50% of fasting glucoses \<120 mg/dL) |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2003-02-01
- Primary completion
- 2009-08-01
- Completion
- 2009-08-01
- First posted
- 2008-05-30
- Last updated
- 2017-05-22
- Results posted
- 2010-10-07
Locations
1 site across 1 country: United States
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00686712. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.