Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT00637663
Continuing Lamivudine Versus Switching to Entecavir in Patients Who Achieved Undetectable Hepatitis B Virus DNA
Randomized, Open-Labeled Study Evaluating the Antiviral Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Continuing Lamivudine Therapy or Switching to Entecavir in Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis B Who Achieved Undetectable HBV DNA
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 72 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Pusan National University Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 70 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This is a randomized, open-labelled, prospective 96-week study comparing the antiviral efficacy and safety of switching to entecavir 0.5mg QD from lamivudine versus maintaining lamivudine 100mg QD treatment in CHB patients currently receiving lamivudine monotherapy.
Detailed description
Entecavir has a higher potent antiviral efficacy and a lower drug resistance rate than those of Lamivudine in nucleoside-naïve CHB patients. The switch from Lamivudine to Entecavir in patients who have undetectable hepatitis B virus DNA (HBV DNA \< 60 IU/mL) may lead to more prolonged viral suppression to undetectable level by PCR method, compared to patients with continuous lamivudine treatment. The results of this study will provide a rationale for switch treatment from one antiviral to another one, especially from LAM to ETV.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Entecavir | entecavir 0.5 mg QD |
| DRUG | Lamivudine | lamivudine 100 mg QD |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2008-02-01
- Primary completion
- 2010-11-01
- Completion
- 2010-11-01
- First posted
- 2008-03-18
- Last updated
- 2015-03-05
Locations
2 sites across 1 country: South Korea
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00637663. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.