Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT00625664
Larotaxel + Cisplatin Versus Gemcitabine + Cisplatin in First Line Treatment of Locally Advanced/Metastatic Urothelial Tract or Bladder Cancer
Randomized Study of LAROTAXEL + Cisplatin (LC) vs. Gemcitabine + Cisplatin (GC) in the First Line Treatment of Locally Advanced/Metastatic Urothelial Tract or Bladder Cancer
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 337 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Sanofi · Industry
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This is a randomized, open-label, multi-center study comparing the efficacy and safety of XRP9881 plus cisplatin to gemcitabine plus cisplatin in the first line treatment of locally advanced/metastatic urothelial tract or bladder cancer. The primary objective is to compare overall survival. Secondary objectives include comparisons of progression free survival, objective response rate, time to definitive deterioration of performance status, duration of response, time to definitive weight loss, and assessments of overall safety, and pharmacokinetics. Patients are treated until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity and are followed-up until death or the end of the study whichever comes first.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | larotaxel (XRP9881) | administered on day 1 as a 1-hour infusion |
| DRUG | gemcitabine | administered on day 1, 8 and 15 as a 30-minute infusion |
| DRUG | cisplatin | 1 hour infusion administered on day 1, 30 minutes after the other treatment |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2008-02-01
- Primary completion
- 2011-02-01
- Completion
- 2011-02-01
- First posted
- 2008-02-28
- Last updated
- 2016-05-05
Locations
160 sites across 19 countries: United States, Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, France, India, Israel, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Russia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Turkey (Türkiye)
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00625664. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.