Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT00610116

Electronic Repositioning With Acuity and Easytrak Leads

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
305 (actual)
Sponsor
Boston Scientific Corporation · Industry
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Evaluate appropriate performance of Electronic Repositioning™ (ER) in the clinical routine, cumulative incidence of phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) \& success rates of Electronic Repositioning (ER) to remove it, various incl. left ventricular pacing (LVP) thresholds and PNS

Detailed description

Bipolar leads for left ventricular pacing (LVP) such as the newly available ACUITY™ or the standard EASYTRAK™ II and EASYTRAK™ III leads from GUIDANT in combination with suitable devices for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) allow for the non-invasive programming of different Left Ventricular Pacing (LVP) configurations. Hence, this Electronic Repositioning (ER) may help physicians to overcome problems in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) such as ineffective biventricular pacing, high Left Ventricular Pacing (LVP) thresholds and phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) without the need for an additional patient's operation to reposition LV leads. The ERACE study it a multi-center, prospective, non-randomized clinical study to document and evaluate appropriate performance of GUIDANT's Electronic Repositioning™ in the clinical routine with respect to the following major aspects: avoidance of PNS and low LVP thresholds (for low battery consumption and extended device longevity) in standard cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEElectronic RepositioningChange of pacing vectors for CRT pacing

Timeline

Start date
2006-09-01
Primary completion
2008-03-01
Completion
2008-09-01
First posted
2008-02-07
Last updated
2021-04-21
Results posted
2021-02-09

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Germany

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00610116. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.