Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT00509392
ClosureFAST vs. Laser Ablation for the Treatment of GSV Disease: A Multicenter, Single-Blinded, Randomized Study.
Radiofrequency Endovenous ClosureFAST vs. Laser Ablation for the Treatment of Great Saphenous Reflux: A Multicenter, Single-Blinded, Randomized Study (RECOVERY)
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 69 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Medtronic Endovascular · Industry
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 80 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The objective of this post-market study is to compare the post-procedure recovery between two types of minimally invasive catheter treatments for venous disease in the Great Saphenous Vein.
Detailed description
Comparison of the post-procedure recovery of radiofrequency (RFA) treatment vs. laser treatment.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Seg. RF Ablation & ClosureFAST catheter | Seg. RF Ablation \& ClosureFAST catheter |
| DEVICE | Endovenous Laser | laser catheter |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2007-03-01
- Primary completion
- 2008-01-01
- Completion
- 2008-01-01
- First posted
- 2007-07-31
- Last updated
- 2017-07-12
- Results posted
- 2017-07-12
Locations
1 site across 1 country: United States
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00509392. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.