Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT00503659
Comparison of Two Methods of Bronchial Methacholine Provocation
Comparison of Two Methods of Bronchial Methacholine Provocation: PC 20 FEV1 Versus PD 20 FEV1
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 48 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 12 Years – 45 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
This study is meant to compare two routine diagnostic approaches in patients with bronchial asthma. Patients are challenged with methacholine in order to measure their bronchial response. We compare the evaluation of the effects of incremental concentrations versus incremental dosages.
Detailed description
Bronchial methacholine challenge is well established in asthma diagnostic and research purposes. ATS guidelines provide a short five-breath dosimeter protocol using a five-step dilution schedule. The Viasys APS system enables a feasible and less time consuming provocation with incremental dosages. In 48 young adults with bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) the ATS-protocol with a five-step protocol using a single dilution of 16 mg/ml methacholine should be compared.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Bronchial methacholine provocation | A short five-breath dosimeter protocol using a five-step dilution schedule according to ATS guidelines (0.0625, 0.25, 1, 4, 16 mg/ml methacholine) |
| PROCEDURE | Bronchial methacholine provocation | A five-step protocol using a single dilution of 16 mg/ml methacholine (0.01, 0.1, 0.4, 0.8, 1.6 mg) |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2007-02-01
- Primary completion
- 2007-12-01
- Completion
- 2007-12-01
- First posted
- 2007-07-19
- Last updated
- 2011-10-12
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Germany
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00503659. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.