Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT00491569

Sarcosine or D-Serine Add-on Treatment for Chronic Schizophrenia

NMDA Enhancers in the Treatment of Schizophrenia: Sarcosine vs. D-Serine

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60 (actual)
Sponsor
China Medical University Hospital · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Both GlyT-1 inhibitors and NMDA-glycine site agonists have been demonstrated to be beneficial for chronic schizophrenia patients. The purpose of this study is to compare efficacy and safety of add-on treatment of sarcosine, a GlyT-1 inhibitor, and D-serine, an NMDA-glycine site agonist, in chronically stable schizophrenia patients who have been stabilized with antipsychotics.

Detailed description

The etiology of schizophrenia remains unclear. Schizophrenia patients reveal positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and cognitive impairments. In addition to dopamine system hyperactivity, hypofunction of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor plays a role in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Consequently, enhancing NMDA receptor neurotransmission has been regarded as a novel treatment approach. To date, there have been several reported trials on NMDA enhancers. Both sarcosine (N-methylglycine, a glycine transporter I inhibitor) and D-serine (a potent NMDA-glycine site agonist) showed therapeutic effects in chronically stable patients. Interestingly, sarcosine appeared more efficacious than D-serine in acutely exacerbated ones when added-on to antipsychotics. Both sarcosine and D-serine yielded excellent safety profiles. It remains unclear whether sarcosine can be also more efficacious than D-serine in the treatment for chronically stable schizophrenia. The aim of this project is to examine the efficacy and safety of add-on treatment of sarcosine vs. D-serine in chronically stable schizophrenia patients who have been stabilized with antipsychotics. In the study, 60-75 schizophrenic patients are recruited into the 6-week trial and randomly assigned into the three groups (2 gm/d sarcosine, 2 gm/d D-serine, or placebo) with a double-blind manner. Clinical manifestation (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale \[PANSS\], side effects and quality of life (QOL) are evaluated every two weeks during the trial.. The efficacies of three groups are compared.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGSarcosine and D-serine

Timeline

Start date
2005-01-01
Completion
2006-12-01
First posted
2007-06-26
Last updated
2007-06-26

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Taiwan

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00491569. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.