Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT00482183
Comparison Between Pioglitazone and SES With type2 DM
Comparison of Bare Metal Stent With Pioglitazone Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 2 / Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 38 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Showa University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 20 Years – 90 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Drug-eluting stents have been shown to decrease restenosis, but were associated with an increased rate of death, as compared with bare-metal stents. Recently, thiazolidinediones effectively reduced restenosis and the risk of repeat target vessel revascularization. We conducted a study to compare the performance of a drug-eluting stent with that of a bare-metal stent with pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetic mellitus.
Detailed description
The study is a prospective cohort trial involving 38 type 2 diabetic patients referred for coronary stenting who were assigned to either the sirolimus-eluting stent group or the pioglitazone group. Quantitative coronary angiography will be performed at study entry and at six months follow-up to evaluate in-stent late luminal loss and the percentage of the luminal diameter and the rate of restenosis. We also analyze major adverse cardiac events at 12 months.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Pioglitazone |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2003-07-01
- Completion
- 2007-06-01
- First posted
- 2007-06-05
- Last updated
- 2007-06-05
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00482183. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.