Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT00478348

Should Prosthetic Repair of Incisional Abdominal Hernias be Drain or Not?

Adequacy of Drainage During Prosthetic Repair of Incisional Abdominal Hernias: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200 (actual)
Sponsor
University of Lausanne Hospitals · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
20 Years – 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether drainage after prosthetic repair of incisional abdominal hernias increases or decreases complications such as infection, seromas and hematomas.

Detailed description

Between 3 to 20% of patients who received a midline laparotomy will develop an incisional hernia. Primary suture of the defect is associated with a recurrence rate between 25 and 50%.Mesh repair is superior with regard to the recurrence (12-20%), but early postoperative complications include infections, hematomas and seromas. Some advocate the use of drains in order to diminish secretions and complications. Other claim that drains increase the complication's rate. In the absence of a randomized controlled trial it's not clear whether drainage could influence positively or negatively the occurence of such complications when performing a prosthetic repair of abdominal incisional hernia. The aim of this study is to answer this question, comparing prospectively two groups of operated patients: the former with drainage and the latter without.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREProsthetic repair of abdominal incisional herniaRives-Stoppa repair of incisional hernia

Timeline

Start date
2007-05-01
Primary completion
2017-10-01
Completion
2017-11-10
First posted
2007-05-24
Last updated
2017-11-17

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Switzerland

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00478348. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.