Trials / Terminated
TerminatedNCT00428207
Glycemic Stability of Insulin Aspart Versus Insulin Lispro in Insulin Pump Therapy
- Status
- Terminated
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 4 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Joslin Diabetes Center · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 75 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine: 1. whether there is a difference between insulin aspart and insulin lispro in continuous insulin pump therapy 2. whether duration of the insulin infusion set placement effect blood sugar control if the infusion set is in place for longer then 72-96 hours
Detailed description
Insulin instability in pump infusion systems can result in unexplained hyperglycemia in patients on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy. We have noted that some pump patients develop glycemic instability with use of insulin lispro, and that this resolves with change to insulin aspart. Several patients using lispro have reported noting a whitish precipitate in the infusion set, and in two cases we have examined the catheters and confirmed biochemically that this precipitate was insulin. Furthermore, in vitro studies indicate that insulin aspart is more resistant to isoelectric precipitation than insulin lispro. Although it has been rare for patients to notice a visible precipitate in the pump catheter, there is a subset of patients using lispro who have noted that their blood glucose levels will tend to rise 2 or more days after the insertion of a new pump infusion system. These findings mirror bench studies showing that the relative stability differences between aspart and lispro in pump infusion systems becomes more apparent over time. The endpoints examined in previous randomized clinical trials comparing aspart and lispro were not directed specifically at assessing the effect of insulin type on glycemic stability. In these previous studies, pump infusion systems were changed every 48 hours whereas most pump patients routinely replace their infusion catheters only every 72-96 hours; this discrepancy may account for the failure of these trials to demonstrate the difference in the stability of insulin aspart and lispro that has been noted in clinical practice. This investigator-initiated clinical trial is intended to assess the safety and efficacy of CSII with insulin aspart compared to insulin lispro with use of pump infusion catheters for up to 96 hours.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Insulin Aspart versus Insulin Lispro | Subjects will be randomly assigned to insulin aspart versus insulin lispro via random number generation. Half of the patients will begin with insulin aspart, and then will be crossed over to insulin lispro. The insulin sequence will be reversed for the other half of the patients. |
| DRUG | Insulin Lispro versus Insulin Aspart | Subjects will be randomly assigned to insulin lispro versus insulin aspart via random number generation. Half of the patients will begin with insulin lispro, and then will be crossed over to insulin aspart. The insulin sequence will be reversed for the other half of the patients. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2007-02-01
- Primary completion
- 2008-08-01
- Completion
- 2008-08-01
- First posted
- 2007-01-29
- Last updated
- 2017-05-30
- Results posted
- 2017-05-30
Locations
1 site across 1 country: United States
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00428207. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.