NCT00373633

Extrapleural Intercostal Catheter vs. Thoracic Epidural for Thoracotomy Pain

A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Extrapleural Intercostal Local Anesthesia Versus Thoracic Epidural for the Managment of Acute Post Thoracotomy Pain

• Status: Terminated
• Phase: Phase 1
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 26 (actual)
• Sponsor: Virginia Commonwealth University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

We will compare thoracic epidural anesthesia which is presently used for management of pain after thoracotomy to an intra-operatively placed extrapleural intercostal catheter. The study wil be double blinded and prospective.

Detailed description

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of thoracic epidural vs. continuous extra-pleural intercostal local anesthesia for the treatment of post thoracotomy pain in adult patients. Study patients will be randomized between the thoracic epidural and continuous extrapleural catheter groups\[Figure 1\]. Because thoracic epidural anesthesia is the gold standard but continuous extrapleural intercostal local anesthesia is potentially easier and less prone to complications, the study will be structured as an "equivalence study". The null hypothesis (Ho) is that continuous intercostal nerve blockade is worse than epidural for post-thoracotomy pain management. Therefore, the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is then that continuous intercostal nerve blockade is equal to or better than epidural for post-thoracotomy pain management.

Conditions

• THoracotomy

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Thoracic Epidural	Gold standard for post thoracotomy pain
PROCEDURE	Extrapleural Intercostal Catheter	Continuous extra-pleural intercostal local anesthesia

Timeline

• Start date: 2006-09-01
• Primary completion: 2012-01-01
• Completion: 2012-01-01
• First posted: 2006-09-08
• Last updated: 2014-08-15

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States