NCT00356044

Arterial Access for Coronary Intervention in Myocardial Infarction

Femoral Versus Radial Access for Coronary Intervention in the Acute Phase of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 4
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 439 (actual)
• Sponsor: Hospital Juan Canalejo · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 80 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the radial and femoral access for percutaneous interventions in the acute phase of the ST elevation acute myocardial infarction in terms of efficacy and security.

Detailed description

Some groups have previously used the radial artery as the access route in the procedures of percutaneous coronary revascularization, with good results. The advantages of the radial compared with femoral access are related to a lower incidence of vascular complications. The radial access has also inconveniences such as a less predictable anatomy which can make the procedure difficult and prolong the time required.The patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction have an increased risk of vascular complications after interventional procedures because previous antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy.On the other hand, the time and success of the procedure are significant prognostic issues.In this sitting, the radial approach might reduce vascular complications and increase other cardiovascular events when comparing with the classical femoral access. For this reason, the purpose of the study is to compare both arterial access in terms of efficacy and security and to quantify the consequences of the advantages and drawbacks of both.

Conditions

• Myocardial Infarction
• Angioplasty, Transluminal, Percutaneous Coronary
• Myocardial Reperfusion

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Coronary angioplasty

Timeline

• Start date: 2004-05-01
• Completion: 2005-12-01
• First posted: 2006-07-25
• Last updated: 2007-07-11

Locations

3 sites across 1 country: Spain