Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT00328510

Comparing Two Forms of Head Immobilization for Stereotactic Radiotherapy

A Randomized Trial Comparing Two Forms of Immobilization of the Head for Fractioned Stereotactic Radiotherapy

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
83 (actual)
Sponsor
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) requires extremely precise and reproducible immobilization of the patient's head. This randomized study compares the efficacy of two commonly used forms of immobilization used for SRT.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: 1\) To compare the efficacy of two commonly used, generally accepted forms of immobilization for the treatment of lesions in the head with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Specifically, this study will use the ExacTRAC kilovoltage imaging system to assess positioning accuracy for these two systems. OUTLINE: Two routinely used methods of immobilization, which differ in their approach to reproduce head position from day-to-day are the Gill-Thomas-Cosman (GTC)frame and the BrainLab thermoplastic mask. The GTC frame fixates on the patient upper detention and thus us in direct mechanical contact with the cranium. The BrainLab mask is a two-part masking system custom-fitted to the front and back of the participant's head. After patients sign an IRB-approved informed consent form, eligible participants are either randomized to either the GTC frame or the mask for their course of SRT. Participants are treated as per standard procedure; however, prior to each treatment, a set of digital kV images (ExacTrac, BrainLabAB, Germany) is taken. These images are fused with reference digitally constructed radiographs obtained from treatment planning CT to yield lateral, longitudinal, and vertical deviations of isocenter and head rotations about respective axes. The primary endpoint of the study is to compare the two systems with respect to mean and standard deviations (SDs) using the distance to isocenter measure.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEGTC frame
DEVICEThermoplastic facemask
RADIATIONStereotactic radiation therapy

Timeline

Start date
2005-02-01
Primary completion
2008-01-01
Completion
2009-09-01
First posted
2006-05-22
Last updated
2016-11-29
Results posted
2013-08-19

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00328510. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.