Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT00306111
Pegfilgrastim vs. Filgrastim - Comparison of Mobilized Blood Stem Cells in Patients With Non Hodgkin-lymphoma
Pegfilgrastim Versus Filgrastim - Intraindividual Comparison of Quantity and Quality of Mobilized Peripheral Blood Stem Cells in Patients With Non Hodgkin-lymphoma
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 14 (actual)
- Sponsor
- University Hospital Tuebingen · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the ability of pegfilgrastim vs. filgrastim to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells in patients with Non Hodgkin-lymphoma in an intraindividual study
Detailed description
Patients with Non Hodgkin-lymphoma undergoing stem cell mobilization for planned high-dose therapy will be treated with two cycles of chemotherapy (etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin, epirubicin), either followed by daily administration of filgrastim (first cycle) or pegfilgrastim (once after the second cycle). The number of circulating cluster of differentiation 34+ cells, colony-forming units and primitive progenitors will be analyzed at corresponding time points. Peripheral blood stem cells will be collected after the second cycle of chemotherapy by leukapheresis. After the second cycle, high-dose therapy with peripheral blood stem cell support will be administered (the protocol will be chosen according to the diagnosis, including total body irradiation-containing regimens).
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | pegfilgrastim | Single dose (6mg) one day after chemotherapy |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2006-01-01
- Primary completion
- 2008-12-01
- Completion
- 2011-12-01
- First posted
- 2006-03-22
- Last updated
- 2014-05-29
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Germany
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00306111. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.